Abel's Calculators — Smarter Decisions. Better Results.Abel's Calculators

Blog

Roth vs Traditional: When Each One Wins (and the Conversion Ladder)

The right answer depends on your tax rate now, your expected rate in retirement, and whether you might retire early. Here's how to think through it.

March 13, 2026

The Core Question: Tax Rate Now vs Later

Traditional contributions are pre-tax — you deduct them from your income now and pay taxes when you withdraw in retirement. Roth contributions are after-tax — you pay taxes now and withdrawals in retirement are tax-free.

The one that builds more after-tax wealth is the one where you pay taxes at the lower rate. If your tax rate is higher now than it will be in retirement, Traditional wins. If your tax rate is lower now, Roth wins.

Most people get this wrong because they compare their current marginal rate to a vague sense of what "taxes in retirement" means. The relevant comparison is your current marginal rate (the rate on the next dollar you earn) vs your effective rate on withdrawals in retirement — which is almost always lower, because retirement income typically starts from zero and fills up the lower brackets first.

Why Traditional Usually Wins During High-Earning Years

Consider someone in the 24% federal tax bracket contributing to a Traditional 401(k). Every dollar they contribute saves 24 cents in taxes right now.

Important: IRA deduction income limits. The tax deduction for Traditional IRA contributions phases out if you or your spouse are covered by a workplace retirement plan. For 2025, the phase-out range is $79,000–$89,000 (single) and $126,000–$146,000 (married filing jointly). Above these ranges, Traditional IRA contributions are not deductible.

However, this limit applies only to IRA contributions. Traditional (pre-tax) 401(k) contributions have no income limit — you get the full deduction regardless of how much you earn. Since most people in these higher income ranges have access to a 401(k), the Traditional vs Roth analysis in this article primarily applies to their 401(k) contributions.

If you're above the IRA deduction phase-out and don't have a 401(k), a backdoor Roth IRA is typically the better option. Since you can't deduct Traditional IRA contributions anyway, there's no tax benefit to leaving the money in a Traditional account — you'd be better off converting it to Roth so future growth is tax-free.

In retirement, their income picture looks different. They're no longer earning a salary or saving 20–30% of their income. Their taxable income starts at zero. The first ~$30,000 of income for a married couple filing jointly is covered by the standard deduction — taxed at 0%. The next ~$24,000 falls in the 10% bracket. The next ~$77,000 falls in the 12% bracket.

So even if they withdraw $80,000/year from their Traditional accounts, their effective federal tax rate on that income is roughly 10–12%. They saved at 24%, and they're paying at 10–12%. That's a significant net benefit for every dollar that went Traditional.

The standard deduction is what makes this especially powerful. Every retiree gets ~$30,000 (married filing jointly) of tax-free income regardless. Traditional contributions that are later withdrawn within that deduction amount are effectively never taxed at all — pre-tax going in, tax-free coming out.

Roth vs Traditional Comparison
$23,000/yr for 20 years — Roth vs Traditional
24% marginal tax rate now • 15% effective rate in retirement • 7% annual return • 20-year contribution period
Roth
Annual contribution (after tax) $23,000
Tax paid upfront $0 (already taxed)
Portfolio after 20yr $1,065,000
Tax on withdrawal $0
Net after-tax wealth $1,065,000
Outcome: $1,065,000 available tax-free in retirement. Simple, predictable.
Traditional + Invest Tax Savings
Annual contribution (pre-tax) $23,000
Tax savings invested ($5,520/yr) Grows to $256,000
Portfolio after 20yr $1,065,000
Tax on withdrawal (15% effective) −$159,750
Plus invested tax savings +$256,000
Net after-tax wealth $1,161,250
Outcome: Traditional + investing the tax savings comes out ~$96k ahead when your retirement tax rate is lower than your current rate.
This comparison assumes you actually invest the tax savings from Traditional contributions. If the tax savings get spent, Roth and Traditional come out roughly even.

The Roth Conversion Ladder

For early retirees, there's a way to get the best of both worlds: contribute Traditional during your working years (when your tax rate is high), then convert to Roth during early retirement (when your income is low or zero).

Here's how the mechanics work:

You retire at, say, 50 with most of your savings in Traditional IRA or 401(k) accounts. Between ages 50 and 67 (before Social Security begins), your earned income is low or nonexistent. During these years, you convert portions of your Traditional balance to Roth each year, strategically filling the lowest tax brackets.

For a married couple filing jointly, the math looks like this:

Compare that to the 24% marginal rate you saved at when you contributed. You saved at 24%, converted at ~4.4%, and now the money is in a Roth where it grows and can be withdrawn completely tax-free for the rest of your life.

The 5-year seasoning rule

There's one important constraint: each Roth conversion has its own 5-year clock. You must wait 5 years from January 1 of the year you converted before you can withdraw that specific converted amount penalty-free (if you're under 59½).

This means you need 5 years of living expenses accessible outside the Roth to bridge the gap. This typically comes from a taxable brokerage account, cash savings, or other accessible funds. Once the first conversion "seasons" after 5 years, each subsequent year's conversion becomes available in sequence — creating a rolling ladder of accessible funds.

When Roth Contributions Make Sense

Despite Traditional's advantage during high-earning years, there are several situations where Roth contributions are the better choice:

A common argument for Roth is that "tax rates will go up in the future." That may be true at the policy level, but the relevant question is whether your tax rate will be higher in retirement than it is now. Most people's taxable income drops in retirement because they're no longer saving 20–30% of their income. Even if bracket rates increase somewhat, your effective rate on a lower income is likely still below your current marginal rate.

A Decision Framework

See how your current tax bracket compares to what you'd likely pay in retirement, and model different withdrawal strategies to find the right approach for your situation.